Ecologist Paul Ehrlich at Stanford University in California says that his climate colleagues are at a loss about how to counter the attacks. “Everyone is scared shitless, but they don’t know what to do,” he says.
Nature, of course, declares that legitimate attacks against the validity of climate science must be met with propaganda rather than real science:
Researchers should not despair. For all the public’s confusion about climate science, polls consistently show that people trust scientists more than almost anybody else to give honest advice…
That’s right, just rely on public trust to push your phony cooked up bogus agenda.
scientists must acknowledge that they are in a street fight, and that their relationship with the media really matters. Anything strategic that can be done on that front would be useful, be it media training for scientists or building links with credible public-relations firms. In this light, there are lessons to be learned from the current spate of controversies.
Scientists must acknowledge that their bogus climate science will be met with real data that discredits their fraud, thus they must take all steps necessary to drowned out any and all criticism by simply declaring:
The core science supporting anthropogenic global warming has not changed. This needs to be stated again and again, in as many contexts as possible.
What a glorious piece of agitprop by the highly credible statist agitators over at Nature.
To expect anything less would be ridiculous.
For some real climate science that isn’t filled with fascist lies, look here.