Comments on: The Big Bang Is A Load Of Junk Science http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/ Hate The State Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:21:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Daniel Knight http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-8099 Daniel Knight Sun, 24 Apr 2011 04:02:00 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-8099 it doesn’t appear to me that u linked to your youtube vids on the big bang here, and if u don’t know or forgot, google video is shutting down in may. for convenience and for those that have trouble reading, please link to those videos here.

Also, were you aware of this?: http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-First-Test-That-Proves-General-Theory-of-Relativity-Wrong-20259.shtml

]]> By: Jimmy http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3734 Jimmy Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:22:30 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3734 I was beginning to think I was the only that rejected evolution and young-earth creationism. What really drives me crazy about the debate is the either-or nature of it. The gripping hand, as it were, is simply ignored.
I’ll have to take a closer look at the science stuff you posted, but you just made my intellectual day, man. Thanks.

]]> By: Jimmy http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3736 Jimmy Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:22:30 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3736 I was beginning to think I was the only that rejected evolution and young-earth creationism. What really drives me crazy about the debate is the either-or nature of it. The gripping hand, as it were, is simply ignored.
I’ll have to take a closer look at the science stuff you posted, but you just made my intellectual day, man. Thanks.

]]> By: Jimmy http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3738 Jimmy Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:22:30 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3738 I was beginning to think I was the only that rejected evolution and young-earth creationism. What really drives me crazy about the debate is the either-or nature of it. The gripping hand, as it were, is simply ignored.
I’ll have to take a closer look at the science stuff you posted, but you just made my intellectual day, man. Thanks.

]]> By: Jimmy http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3740 Jimmy Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:22:30 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3740 I was beginning to think I was the only that rejected evolution and young-earth creationism. What really drives me crazy about the debate is the either-or nature of it. The gripping hand, as it were, is simply ignored.
I’ll have to take a closer look at the science stuff you posted, but you just made my intellectual day, man. Thanks.

]]> By: Jimmy http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3742 Jimmy Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:22:30 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3742 I was beginning to think I was the only that rejected evolution and young-earth creationism. What really drives me crazy about the debate is the either-or nature of it. The gripping hand, as it were, is simply ignored.
I’ll have to take a closer look at the science stuff you posted, but you just made my intellectual day, man. Thanks.

]]> By: Jimmy http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3744 Jimmy Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:22:30 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3744 I was beginning to think I was the only that rejected evolution and young-earth creationism. What really drives me crazy about the debate is the either-or nature of it. The gripping hand, as it were, is simply ignored.
I’ll have to take a closer look at the science stuff you posted, but you just made my intellectual day, man. Thanks.

]]> By: Jimmy http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3746 Jimmy Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:22:30 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3746 I was beginning to think I was the only that rejected evolution and young-earth creationism. What really drives me crazy about the debate is the either-or nature of it. The gripping hand, as it were, is simply ignored.
I’ll have to take a closer look at the science stuff you posted, but you just made my intellectual day, man. Thanks.

]]> By: mouser98 http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3733 mouser98 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:05:57 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3733 theoretically, the entropy of a black hole turns out not to be related to its volume, but its surface area. this leads to the notion that all of reality (as we perceive it in our three dimensions) is a holographic projection of information contained in 2 dimensions into the third dimension. that means that things that appear to be matter to us, are really energy wave interference patterns… if our brains were adapted to perceive additional dimensions, we would see the world in a vastly different way, and be able to walk through walls and trees and such.

as it is, the real question to me seems to be does consciousness exist within us, or have our brains evolved to a point where we perceive a field of consciousness that exists outside of us. as Bill Hicks put it, are we “all one conscious experiencing itself subjectively”?

oh well, none of it matters, lets lynch all the banksters!!!

]]> By: mouser98 http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/04/06/the-big-bang-is-a-load-of-junk-science/#comment-3735 mouser98 Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:05:57 +0000 http://fascistsoup.com/?p=3220#comment-3735 theoretically, the entropy of a black hole turns out not to be related to its volume, but its surface area. this leads to the notion that all of reality (as we perceive it in our three dimensions) is a holographic projection of information contained in 2 dimensions into the third dimension. that means that things that appear to be matter to us, are really energy wave interference patterns… if our brains were adapted to perceive additional dimensions, we would see the world in a vastly different way, and be able to walk through walls and trees and such.

as it is, the real question to me seems to be does consciousness exist within us, or have our brains evolved to a point where we perceive a field of consciousness that exists outside of us. as Bill Hicks put it, are we “all one conscious experiencing itself subjectively”?

oh well, none of it matters, lets lynch all the banksters!!!

]]>