Free Humor On Free Republic

wtf is zot?

wtf is zot?

wtf is zot?

I’m not sure.

They seem to like using it over there.

I think it means “to ban” or something.

I’m not sure.

They seem to like using it over there.

I think it means “to ban” or something.

I’m not sure.

They seem to like using it over there.

I think it means “to ban” or something.

I’m not sure.

They seem to like using it over there.

I think it means “to ban” or something.

i don’t think i have ever seen a bigger collection of war mongering retards in one place since Poland got invaded.

i don’t think i have ever seen a bigger collection of war mongering retards in one place since Poland got invaded.

i don’t think i have ever seen a bigger collection of war mongering retards in one place since Poland got invaded.

what scares me is the amount of web traffic that site does.

There’s a whole lot of people out there that want war war war.

I’m sure there’s people that read my post and agreed with my position; however, if they were to say as much they would be banned.

what scares me is the amount of web traffic that site does.

There’s a whole lot of people out there that want war war war.

I’m sure there’s people that read my post and agreed with my position; however, if they were to say as much they would be banned.

what scares me is the amount of web traffic that site does.

There’s a whole lot of people out there that want war war war.

I’m sure there’s people that read my post and agreed with my position; however, if they were to say as much they would be banned.

what scares me is the amount of web traffic that site does.

There’s a whole lot of people out there that want war war war.

I’m sure there’s people that read my post and agreed with my position; however, if they were to say as much they would be banned.

Awww…did it hurt your feelings?
I see by your readership that you were a troll there, you deserved your ban.
Go ahead and try to signup there again.
I’m sure they’ll love hijacking your troll threads.

Awww…did it hurt your feelings?
I see by your readership that you were a troll there, you deserved your ban.
Go ahead and try to signup there again.
I’m sure they’ll love hijacking your troll threads.

Awww…did it hurt your feelings?
I see by your readership that you were a troll there, you deserved your ban.
Go ahead and try to signup there again.
I’m sure they’ll love hijacking your troll threads.

It gave me a good laugh.

It takes a little more than some 10 year olds trolling me with cat pictures to upset me.

They actually provided me with some quality blog material, so I feel like I should thank them or something.

It gave me a good laugh.

It takes a little more than some 10 year olds trolling me with cat pictures to upset me.

They actually provided me with some quality blog material, so I feel like I should thank them or something.

It gave me a good laugh.

It takes a little more than some 10 year olds trolling me with cat pictures to upset me.

They actually provided me with some quality blog material, so I feel like I should thank them or something.

It gave me a good laugh.

It takes a little more than some 10 year olds trolling me with cat pictures to upset me.

They actually provided me with some quality blog material, so I feel like I should thank them or something.

I noticed taht you didn’t respond to these:

“I have a gun and I can defend myself from terrorists.”

Unless they fly a plane into you.
Or blow you up remotely without you knowing they’re there.
Fat lot of good a gun does against a remotely detonated bomb.

And:

Terrorism doesn’t respect sovereignty, or borders, or beliefs.
It does not care whether you haven’t bothered them.

Is it because you had no answer for that?

I noticed taht you didn’t respond to these:

“I have a gun and I can defend myself from terrorists.”

Unless they fly a plane into you.
Or blow you up remotely without you knowing they’re there.
Fat lot of good a gun does against a remotely detonated bomb.

And:

Terrorism doesn’t respect sovereignty, or borders, or beliefs.
It does not care whether you haven’t bothered them.

Is it because you had no answer for that?

I noticed taht you didn’t respond to these:

“I have a gun and I can defend myself from terrorists.”

Unless they fly a plane into you.
Or blow you up remotely without you knowing they’re there.
Fat lot of good a gun does against a remotely detonated bomb.

And:

Terrorism doesn’t respect sovereignty, or borders, or beliefs.
It does not care whether you haven’t bothered them.

Is it because you had no answer for that?

Quran tells Muslims to kill the disbelievers wherever they find them (Q. 2:191), to murder them and treat them harshly (Q. 9:123), slay them (Q. 9: 5), fight with them, (Q. 8: 65 ) even if they are Christians and Jews, humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax (Q. 9: 29). Quran takes away the freedom of belief from all humanity and tell clearly that no other religion except Islam is accepted (Q. 3: 85). It relegates those who disbelieve in Quran to hell (Q. 5: 11), calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (Q. 9: 28). It orders its followers to fight the unbelievers until no other religion except Islam is left (Q. 2: 193). It says that the non-believers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q. 14: 17). It asks the Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that “they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter” (Q.5: 34). “As for the disbelievers”, it says that “for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods” (Q. 22: 9). Quran prohibits a Muslim to befriend a non-believer even if that non-believer is the father or the brother of that Muslim (Q. 9: 23), (Q. 3: 28). Quran asks the Muslims to “strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q. 25: 52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q. 66: 9). The holy Prophet demanded his follower to “strike off the heads of the disbelievers”; then after making a “wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Q. 47: 4). As for women the book of Allah says that they are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to scourge them if they are found disobedient (Q. 4:34). It teaches that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q. 66:10). It maintains that men have an advantage over the women (Q. 2:228). It not only denies the women’s equal right to their inheritance (Q. 4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their witness is not admissible in the court (Q. 2:282). This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness. Muhammad allowed the Muslims to marry up to four views and gave them license to sleep with their slave maids and as many “captive” women as they may have (Q. 4:3). He himself did just that. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and allow themselves to rape their women. Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bangali women in 1971 after they massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are unislamic. This is why the prison guards in Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah.

Quran tells Muslims to kill the disbelievers wherever they find them (Q. 2:191), to murder them and treat them harshly (Q. 9:123), slay them (Q. 9: 5), fight with them, (Q. 8: 65 ) even if they are Christians and Jews, humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax (Q. 9: 29). Quran takes away the freedom of belief from all humanity and tell clearly that no other religion except Islam is accepted (Q. 3: 85). It relegates those who disbelieve in Quran to hell (Q. 5: 11), calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (Q. 9: 28). It orders its followers to fight the unbelievers until no other religion except Islam is left (Q. 2: 193). It says that the non-believers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q. 14: 17). It asks the Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that “they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter” (Q.5: 34). “As for the disbelievers”, it says that “for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods” (Q. 22: 9). Quran prohibits a Muslim to befriend a non-believer even if that non-believer is the father or the brother of that Muslim (Q. 9: 23), (Q. 3: 28). Quran asks the Muslims to “strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q. 25: 52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q. 66: 9). The holy Prophet demanded his follower to “strike off the heads of the disbelievers”; then after making a “wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Q. 47: 4). As for women the book of Allah says that they are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to scourge them if they are found disobedient (Q. 4:34). It teaches that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q. 66:10). It maintains that men have an advantage over the women (Q. 2:228). It not only denies the women’s equal right to their inheritance (Q. 4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their witness is not admissible in the court (Q. 2:282). This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness. Muhammad allowed the Muslims to marry up to four views and gave them license to sleep with their slave maids and as many “captive” women as they may have (Q. 4:3). He himself did just that. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and allow themselves to rape their women. Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bangali women in 1971 after they massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are unislamic. This is why the prison guards in Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah.

Quran tells Muslims to kill the disbelievers wherever they find them (Q. 2:191), to murder them and treat them harshly (Q. 9:123), slay them (Q. 9: 5), fight with them, (Q. 8: 65 ) even if they are Christians and Jews, humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax (Q. 9: 29). Quran takes away the freedom of belief from all humanity and tell clearly that no other religion except Islam is accepted (Q. 3: 85). It relegates those who disbelieve in Quran to hell (Q. 5: 11), calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (Q. 9: 28). It orders its followers to fight the unbelievers until no other religion except Islam is left (Q. 2: 193). It says that the non-believers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q. 14: 17). It asks the Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that “they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter” (Q.5: 34). “As for the disbelievers”, it says that “for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods” (Q. 22: 9). Quran prohibits a Muslim to befriend a non-believer even if that non-believer is the father or the brother of that Muslim (Q. 9: 23), (Q. 3: 28). Quran asks the Muslims to “strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q. 25: 52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q. 66: 9). The holy Prophet demanded his follower to “strike off the heads of the disbelievers”; then after making a “wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Q. 47: 4). As for women the book of Allah says that they are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to scourge them if they are found disobedient (Q. 4:34). It teaches that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q. 66:10). It maintains that men have an advantage over the women (Q. 2:228). It not only denies the women’s equal right to their inheritance (Q. 4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their witness is not admissible in the court (Q. 2:282). This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness. Muhammad allowed the Muslims to marry up to four views and gave them license to sleep with their slave maids and as many “captive” women as they may have (Q. 4:3). He himself did just that. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and allow themselves to rape their women. Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bangali women in 1971 after they massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are unislamic. This is why the prison guards in Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah.

Quran tells Muslims to kill the disbelievers wherever they find them (Q. 2:191), to murder them and treat them harshly (Q. 9:123), slay them (Q. 9: 5), fight with them, (Q. 8: 65 ) even if they are Christians and Jews, humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax (Q. 9: 29). Quran takes away the freedom of belief from all humanity and tell clearly that no other religion except Islam is accepted (Q. 3: 85). It relegates those who disbelieve in Quran to hell (Q. 5: 11), calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (Q. 9: 28). It orders its followers to fight the unbelievers until no other religion except Islam is left (Q. 2: 193). It says that the non-believers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q. 14: 17). It asks the Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that “they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter” (Q.5: 34). “As for the disbelievers”, it says that “for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods” (Q. 22: 9). Quran prohibits a Muslim to befriend a non-believer even if that non-believer is the father or the brother of that Muslim (Q. 9: 23), (Q. 3: 28). Quran asks the Muslims to “strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q. 25: 52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q. 66: 9). The holy Prophet demanded his follower to “strike off the heads of the disbelievers”; then after making a “wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Q. 47: 4). As for women the book of Allah says that they are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to scourge them if they are found disobedient (Q. 4:34). It teaches that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q. 66:10). It maintains that men have an advantage over the women (Q. 2:228). It not only denies the women’s equal right to their inheritance (Q. 4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their witness is not admissible in the court (Q. 2:282). This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness. Muhammad allowed the Muslims to marry up to four views and gave them license to sleep with their slave maids and as many “captive” women as they may have (Q. 4:3). He himself did just that. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and allow themselves to rape their women. Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bangali women in 1971 after they massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are unislamic. This is why the prison guards in Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah.

“while at the same time censoring or mocking speech that is anti-statist in nature.”

Only governments censor.
Private property is private property, and the site owner is free to tell those who are not wanted to get lost.
And as I understand it, that site is privately owned, hence the owner can tell you to stuff it if you are trolling, which you obviously were.
If you went to Daily Kos or DemUn, would you whine like this about them banning you?
Probably not.

“while at the same time censoring or mocking speech that is anti-statist in nature.”

Only governments censor.
Private property is private property, and the site owner is free to tell those who are not wanted to get lost.
And as I understand it, that site is privately owned, hence the owner can tell you to stuff it if you are trolling, which you obviously were.
If you went to Daily Kos or DemUn, would you whine like this about them banning you?
Probably not.

“while at the same time censoring or mocking speech that is anti-statist in nature.”

Only governments censor.
Private property is private property, and the site owner is free to tell those who are not wanted to get lost.
And as I understand it, that site is privately owned, hence the owner can tell you to stuff it if you are trolling, which you obviously were.
If you went to Daily Kos or DemUn, would you whine like this about them banning you?
Probably not.

I noticed that you claim they’re all Christians.
I don’t see proof of that anywhere on the thread you posted there.
Where’s your proof for that broad brush claim?
What if there are neopagans on that thread, they might dislike being called Christians and sue you.

I noticed that you claim they’re all Christians.
I don’t see proof of that anywhere on the thread you posted there.
Where’s your proof for that broad brush claim?
What if there are neopagans on that thread, they might dislike being called Christians and sue you.

I noticed that you claim they’re all Christians.
I don’t see proof of that anywhere on the thread you posted there.
Where’s your proof for that broad brush claim?
What if there are neopagans on that thread, they might dislike being called Christians and sue you.

I noticed that you claim they’re all Christians.
I don’t see proof of that anywhere on the thread you posted there.
Where’s your proof for that broad brush claim?
What if there are neopagans on that thread, they might dislike being called Christians and sue you.

I see that you’re as responsive here in your own blog as you were on your troll thread over at Free Republic.
Tell me, do you often post and run?
And do you amaze the children at 4chan with your amazing post and run skills?

I see that you’re as responsive here in your own blog as you were on your troll thread over at Free Republic.
Tell me, do you often post and run?
And do you amaze the children at 4chan with your amazing post and run skills?

I see that you’re as responsive here in your own blog as you were on your troll thread over at Free Republic.
Tell me, do you often post and run?
And do you amaze the children at 4chan with your amazing post and run skills?

don’t be mad that i just trolled you.

don’t be mad that i just trolled you.

don’t be mad that i just trolled you.

don’t be mad that i just trolled you.

LOL, not mad.
Just wondering why you run away all the time.
Does it bother you when people confront you?

LOL, not mad.
Just wondering why you run away all the time.
Does it bother you when people confront you?

LOL, not mad.
Just wondering why you run away all the time.
Does it bother you when people confront you?

My positions are based on the principles of limited government and personal freedom.

I don’t need the state to take care of me or protect me.

I certainly don’t need the state to protect me from “terrorists.” You have a better chance of being struck by lightning – literally – than by being killed in a terrorist attack.

A trillion dollars to prevent something that’s less likely to occur than getting killed driving down the highway is an epic waste of resources.

My positions are based on the principles of limited government and personal freedom.

I don’t need the state to take care of me or protect me.

I certainly don’t need the state to protect me from “terrorists.” You have a better chance of being struck by lightning – literally – than by being killed in a terrorist attack.

A trillion dollars to prevent something that’s less likely to occur than getting killed driving down the highway is an epic waste of resources.

My positions are based on the principles of limited government and personal freedom.

I don’t need the state to take care of me or protect me.

I certainly don’t need the state to protect me from “terrorists.” You have a better chance of being struck by lightning – literally – than by being killed in a terrorist attack.

A trillion dollars to prevent something that’s less likely to occur than getting killed driving down the highway is an epic waste of resources.

My positions are based on the principles of limited government and personal freedom.

I don’t need the state to take care of me or protect me.

I certainly don’t need the state to protect me from “terrorists.” You have a better chance of being struck by lightning – literally – than by being killed in a terrorist attack.

A trillion dollars to prevent something that’s less likely to occur than getting killed driving down the highway is an epic waste of resources.