Dylan Ratigan Details The Banking Fraud

Amazingly enough, MSNBC’s communist Dylan Ratigan tells the truth about the banking fraud.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

followed by Chinese students laughing at the criminal Geithner as he talks about the dollar.

  • http://freedom00is00earned.blogspot.com Pat Donnelly

    Banking is only a fraud to those who do not understand the theft by inflation, Austrian school, and the inevitability of corruption by Ponzi, as you septics call it, as set out by Kondratieff.

    When an obviously suspect source (a communist you say?) sets out a fact, it is only to have it set up as a crank opinion and thereby to discredit it. They have many tricks. Remember when W was against AGW? That virtually confirmed it as fact for 20% of the people who should know better.

    Without banking, there is no war, as it cannot be financed. Without banking there is no money laundering. Banking in the sense of clearing funds and paying wages and so on should be fully state controlled? I detest the state, but banking is so dangerous that a state monopoly is the only way? Any ideas?

  • http://freedom00is00earned.blogspot.com Pat Donnelly

    Banking is only a fraud to those who do not understand the theft by inflation, Austrian school, and the inevitability of corruption by Ponzi, as you septics call it, as set out by Kondratieff.

    When an obviously suspect source (a communist you say?) sets out a fact, it is only to have it set up as a crank opinion and thereby to discredit it. They have many tricks. Remember when W was against AGW? That virtually confirmed it as fact for 20% of the people who should know better.

    Without banking, there is no war, as it cannot be financed. Without banking there is no money laundering. Banking in the sense of clearing funds and paying wages and so on should be fully state controlled? I detest the state, but banking is so dangerous that a state monopoly is the only way? Any ideas?

  • http://freedom00is00earned.blogspot.com Pat Donnelly

    Banking is only a fraud to those who do not understand the theft by inflation, Austrian school, and the inevitability of corruption by Ponzi, as you septics call it, as set out by Kondratieff.

    When an obviously suspect source (a communist you say?) sets out a fact, it is only to have it set up as a crank opinion and thereby to discredit it. They have many tricks. Remember when W was against AGW? That virtually confirmed it as fact for 20% of the people who should know better.

    Without banking, there is no war, as it cannot be financed. Without banking there is no money laundering. Banking in the sense of clearing funds and paying wages and so on should be fully state controlled? I detest the state, but banking is so dangerous that a state monopoly is the only way? Any ideas?

  • http://freedom00is00earned.blogspot.com Pat Donnelly

    Banking is only a fraud to those who do not understand the theft by inflation, Austrian school, and the inevitability of corruption by Ponzi, as you septics call it, as set out by Kondratieff.

    When an obviously suspect source (a communist you say?) sets out a fact, it is only to have it set up as a crank opinion and thereby to discredit it. They have many tricks. Remember when W was against AGW? That virtually confirmed it as fact for 20% of the people who should know better.

    Without banking, there is no war, as it cannot be financed. Without banking there is no money laundering. Banking in the sense of clearing funds and paying wages and so on should be fully state controlled? I detest the state, but banking is so dangerous that a state monopoly is the only way? Any ideas?

  • http://freedom00is00earned.blogspot.com Pat Donnelly

    Banking is only a fraud to those who do not understand the theft by inflation, Austrian school, and the inevitability of corruption by Ponzi, as you septics call it, as set out by Kondratieff.

    When an obviously suspect source (a communist you say?) sets out a fact, it is only to have it set up as a crank opinion and thereby to discredit it. They have many tricks. Remember when W was against AGW? That virtually confirmed it as fact for 20% of the people who should know better.

    Without banking, there is no war, as it cannot be financed. Without banking there is no money laundering. Banking in the sense of clearing funds and paying wages and so on should be fully state controlled? I detest the state, but banking is so dangerous that a state monopoly is the only way? Any ideas?

  • http://freedom00is00earned.blogspot.com Pat Donnelly

    Banking is only a fraud to those who do not understand the theft by inflation, Austrian school, and the inevitability of corruption by Ponzi, as you septics call it, as set out by Kondratieff.

    When an obviously suspect source (a communist you say?) sets out a fact, it is only to have it set up as a crank opinion and thereby to discredit it. They have many tricks. Remember when W was against AGW? That virtually confirmed it as fact for 20% of the people who should know better.

    Without banking, there is no war, as it cannot be financed. Without banking there is no money laundering. Banking in the sense of clearing funds and paying wages and so on should be fully state controlled? I detest the state, but banking is so dangerous that a state monopoly is the only way? Any ideas?

  • http://freedom00is00earned.blogspot.com Pat Donnelly

    Banking is only a fraud to those who do not understand the theft by inflation, Austrian school, and the inevitability of corruption by Ponzi, as you septics call it, as set out by Kondratieff.

    When an obviously suspect source (a communist you say?) sets out a fact, it is only to have it set up as a crank opinion and thereby to discredit it. They have many tricks. Remember when W was against AGW? That virtually confirmed it as fact for 20% of the people who should know better.

    Without banking, there is no war, as it cannot be financed. Without banking there is no money laundering. Banking in the sense of clearing funds and paying wages and so on should be fully state controlled? I detest the state, but banking is so dangerous that a state monopoly is the only way? Any ideas?

  • mouser98

    how does handing it over to the state make it less dangerous? the same people will still gravitate to positions to control it and benefit by it.

    the solution is the abolition of the state. true you cannot have war without banking, or money laundering, but you cannot have war without the state, or illegal markets that make money laundering necessary.

    convince a hefty portion of the population that their birthright is complete freedom and that the state is an unnecessary evil, that is the solution to all unnatural human suffering.

  • mouser98

    how does handing it over to the state make it less dangerous? the same people will still gravitate to positions to control it and benefit by it.

    the solution is the abolition of the state. true you cannot have war without banking, or money laundering, but you cannot have war without the state, or illegal markets that make money laundering necessary.

    convince a hefty portion of the population that their birthright is complete freedom and that the state is an unnecessary evil, that is the solution to all unnatural human suffering.

  • mouser98

    how does handing it over to the state make it less dangerous? the same people will still gravitate to positions to control it and benefit by it.

    the solution is the abolition of the state. true you cannot have war without banking, or money laundering, but you cannot have war without the state, or illegal markets that make money laundering necessary.

    convince a hefty portion of the population that their birthright is complete freedom and that the state is an unnecessary evil, that is the solution to all unnatural human suffering.

  • mouser98

    how does handing it over to the state make it less dangerous? the same people will still gravitate to positions to control it and benefit by it.

    the solution is the abolition of the state. true you cannot have war without banking, or money laundering, but you cannot have war without the state, or illegal markets that make money laundering necessary.

    convince a hefty portion of the population that their birthright is complete freedom and that the state is an unnecessary evil, that is the solution to all unnatural human suffering.

  • mouser98

    how does handing it over to the state make it less dangerous? the same people will still gravitate to positions to control it and benefit by it.

    the solution is the abolition of the state. true you cannot have war without banking, or money laundering, but you cannot have war without the state, or illegal markets that make money laundering necessary.

    convince a hefty portion of the population that their birthright is complete freedom and that the state is an unnecessary evil, that is the solution to all unnatural human suffering.

  • mouser98

    how does handing it over to the state make it less dangerous? the same people will still gravitate to positions to control it and benefit by it.

    the solution is the abolition of the state. true you cannot have war without banking, or money laundering, but you cannot have war without the state, or illegal markets that make money laundering necessary.

    convince a hefty portion of the population that their birthright is complete freedom and that the state is an unnecessary evil, that is the solution to all unnatural human suffering.

  • mouser98

    how does handing it over to the state make it less dangerous? the same people will still gravitate to positions to control it and benefit by it.

    the solution is the abolition of the state. true you cannot have war without banking, or money laundering, but you cannot have war without the state, or illegal markets that make money laundering necessary.

    convince a hefty portion of the population that their birthright is complete freedom and that the state is an unnecessary evil, that is the solution to all unnatural human suffering.