Bill Gaede Is God

rick james

this is dis info tactics, this experiment gives light to the hidden nature to our reality, that is, it’s an illusion, this is the first experiment that can prove it.

bottom line is this, the particle creates a wave pattern interference after passing through the double slits, and hitting the board confusing the scientist they decide to observe the particle as it passes through the slits, this time the particle hits the board and makes a solid particle pattern with no wave interference, the only difference is that they observed, their observing changed existence and this is a repeatable experiment.

THAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE, dont ever forget it, cause they are trying hard to cover it up, play it down, and use disinfo like this to make us forget that they figured this out, more power for them if we dont figure out our control over existence itself.

Bill Gaede doesnt know what he’s talking about, both your sources are way off base, bill doesnt address the most important part and makes no point about whatever he does say, and your source for the double slit experiment also doesnt even mention the most important part of the experiment, this is how dis-info infects the science world.
from http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/21590

“The early generations of quantum physicists, led by Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and John von Neumann, insisted that there is a strong division between the classical world and the quantum realm, although they conceded that the boundary is not fixed by the laws of physics. Their view was that the transformation into “classicality” is effected by the very act of observation; the idea being that the wavefunction “collapses” to a particular value when the observation takes place. To avoid the seemingly decisive role played by the observer, physicists” – (began coming up with any far out idea the could and when that failed they simplied lied to the public closed down particular websites that professed the truth, and put down in technical books that it must be because of an unknown anomaly they even go so far as to say the atmospher interfers, this makes no sense for one because we are only talking about the difference of observation of the particles passing through the slits, or not observing the pass. Condensing before the board or not is only caused by observing its passage through the slits. regardless of that this experiment has been done in a vaccum.)
the significance of this expirement and the motive behind censoring it with these disinfo tactics is that its one the most revolutionary findings ever, it proves beyond a doubt that our actual conciousness is the creater of all that we physical know to exist, this will lead pondering minds to realise we should be able to control the physical by thought, like a god, well this may very well be true if the effect between your concious recognition and the particle could learn to be sensed and controled. the government doesnt want us knowing that.

rick james

this is dis info tactics, this experiment gives light to the hidden nature to our reality, that is, it’s an illusion, this is the first experiment that can prove it.

bottom line is this, the particle creates a wave pattern interference after passing through the double slits, and hitting the board confusing the scientist they decide to observe the particle as it passes through the slits, this time the particle hits the board and makes a solid particle pattern with no wave interference, the only difference is that they observed, their observing changed existence and this is a repeatable experiment.

THAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE, dont ever forget it, cause they are trying hard to cover it up, play it down, and use disinfo like this to make us forget that they figured this out, more power for them if we dont figure out our control over existence itself.

Bill Gaede doesnt know what he’s talking about, both your sources are way off base, bill doesnt address the most important part and makes no point about whatever he does say, and your source for the double slit experiment also doesnt even mention the most important part of the experiment, this is how dis-info infects the science world.
from http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/21590

“The early generations of quantum physicists, led by Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and John von Neumann, insisted that there is a strong division between the classical world and the quantum realm, although they conceded that the boundary is not fixed by the laws of physics. Their view was that the transformation into “classicality” is effected by the very act of observation; the idea being that the wavefunction “collapses” to a particular value when the observation takes place. To avoid the seemingly decisive role played by the observer, physicists” – (began coming up with any far out idea the could and when that failed they simplied lied to the public closed down particular websites that professed the truth, and put down in technical books that it must be because of an unknown anomaly they even go so far as to say the atmospher interfers, this makes no sense for one because we are only talking about the difference of observation of the particles passing through the slits, or not observing the pass. Condensing before the board or not is only caused by observing its passage through the slits. regardless of that this experiment has been done in a vaccum.)
the significance of this expirement and the motive behind censoring it with these disinfo tactics is that its one the most revolutionary findings ever, it proves beyond a doubt that our actual conciousness is the creater of all that we physical know to exist, this will lead pondering minds to realise we should be able to control the physical by thought, like a god, well this may very well be true if the effect between your concious recognition and the particle could learn to be sensed and controled. the government doesnt want us knowing that.

rick james

this is dis info tactics, this experiment gives light to the hidden nature to our reality, that is, it’s an illusion, this is the first experiment that can prove it.

bottom line is this, the particle creates a wave pattern interference after passing through the double slits, and hitting the board confusing the scientist they decide to observe the particle as it passes through the slits, this time the particle hits the board and makes a solid particle pattern with no wave interference, the only difference is that they observed, their observing changed existence and this is a repeatable experiment.

THAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE, dont ever forget it, cause they are trying hard to cover it up, play it down, and use disinfo like this to make us forget that they figured this out, more power for them if we dont figure out our control over existence itself.

Bill Gaede doesnt know what he’s talking about, both your sources are way off base, bill doesnt address the most important part and makes no point about whatever he does say, and your source for the double slit experiment also doesnt even mention the most important part of the experiment, this is how dis-info infects the science world.
from http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/21590

“The early generations of quantum physicists, led by Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and John von Neumann, insisted that there is a strong division between the classical world and the quantum realm, although they conceded that the boundary is not fixed by the laws of physics. Their view was that the transformation into “classicality” is effected by the very act of observation; the idea being that the wavefunction “collapses” to a particular value when the observation takes place. To avoid the seemingly decisive role played by the observer, physicists” – (began coming up with any far out idea the could and when that failed they simplied lied to the public closed down particular websites that professed the truth, and put down in technical books that it must be because of an unknown anomaly they even go so far as to say the atmospher interfers, this makes no sense for one because we are only talking about the difference of observation of the particles passing through the slits, or not observing the pass. Condensing before the board or not is only caused by observing its passage through the slits. regardless of that this experiment has been done in a vaccum.)
the significance of this expirement and the motive behind censoring it with these disinfo tactics is that its one the most revolutionary findings ever, it proves beyond a doubt that our actual conciousness is the creater of all that we physical know to exist, this will lead pondering minds to realise we should be able to control the physical by thought, like a god, well this may very well be true if the effect between your concious recognition and the particle could learn to be sensed and controled. the government doesnt want us knowing that.

rick james

this is dis info tactics, this experiment gives light to the hidden nature to our reality, that is, it’s an illusion, this is the first experiment that can prove it.

bottom line is this, the particle creates a wave pattern interference after passing through the double slits, and hitting the board confusing the scientist they decide to observe the particle as it passes through the slits, this time the particle hits the board and makes a solid particle pattern with no wave interference, the only difference is that they observed, their observing changed existence and this is a repeatable experiment.

THAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE, dont ever forget it, cause they are trying hard to cover it up, play it down, and use disinfo like this to make us forget that they figured this out, more power for them if we dont figure out our control over existence itself.

Bill Gaede doesnt know what he’s talking about, both your sources are way off base, bill doesnt address the most important part and makes no point about whatever he does say, and your source for the double slit experiment also doesnt even mention the most important part of the experiment, this is how dis-info infects the science world.
from http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/21590

“The early generations of quantum physicists, led by Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and John von Neumann, insisted that there is a strong division between the classical world and the quantum realm, although they conceded that the boundary is not fixed by the laws of physics. Their view was that the transformation into “classicality” is effected by the very act of observation; the idea being that the wavefunction “collapses” to a particular value when the observation takes place. To avoid the seemingly decisive role played by the observer, physicists” – (began coming up with any far out idea the could and when that failed they simplied lied to the public closed down particular websites that professed the truth, and put down in technical books that it must be because of an unknown anomaly they even go so far as to say the atmospher interfers, this makes no sense for one because we are only talking about the difference of observation of the particles passing through the slits, or not observing the pass. Condensing before the board or not is only caused by observing its passage through the slits. regardless of that this experiment has been done in a vaccum.)
the significance of this expirement and the motive behind censoring it with these disinfo tactics is that its one the most revolutionary findings ever, it proves beyond a doubt that our actual conciousness is the creater of all that we physical know to exist, this will lead pondering minds to realise we should be able to control the physical by thought, like a god, well this may very well be true if the effect between your concious recognition and the particle could learn to be sensed and controled. the government doesnt want us knowing that.

rick james

this is dis info tactics, this experiment gives light to the hidden nature to our reality, that is, it’s an illusion, this is the first experiment that can prove it.

bottom line is this, the particle creates a wave pattern interference after passing through the double slits, and hitting the board confusing the scientist they decide to observe the particle as it passes through the slits, this time the particle hits the board and makes a solid particle pattern with no wave interference, the only difference is that they observed, their observing changed existence and this is a repeatable experiment.

THAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE, dont ever forget it, cause they are trying hard to cover it up, play it down, and use disinfo like this to make us forget that they figured this out, more power for them if we dont figure out our control over existence itself.

Bill Gaede doesnt know what he’s talking about, both your sources are way off base, bill doesnt address the most important part and makes no point about whatever he does say, and your source for the double slit experiment also doesnt even mention the most important part of the experiment, this is how dis-info infects the science world.
from http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/21590

“The early generations of quantum physicists, led by Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and John von Neumann, insisted that there is a strong division between the classical world and the quantum realm, although they conceded that the boundary is not fixed by the laws of physics. Their view was that the transformation into “classicality” is effected by the very act of observation; the idea being that the wavefunction “collapses” to a particular value when the observation takes place. To avoid the seemingly decisive role played by the observer, physicists” – (began coming up with any far out idea the could and when that failed they simplied lied to the public closed down particular websites that professed the truth, and put down in technical books that it must be because of an unknown anomaly they even go so far as to say the atmospher interfers, this makes no sense for one because we are only talking about the difference of observation of the particles passing through the slits, or not observing the pass. Condensing before the board or not is only caused by observing its passage through the slits. regardless of that this experiment has been done in a vaccum.)
the significance of this expirement and the motive behind censoring it with these disinfo tactics is that its one the most revolutionary findings ever, it proves beyond a doubt that our actual conciousness is the creater of all that we physical know to exist, this will lead pondering minds to realise we should be able to control the physical by thought, like a god, well this may very well be true if the effect between your concious recognition and the particle could learn to be sensed and controled. the government doesnt want us knowing that.

rick james

this is dis info tactics, this experiment gives light to the hidden nature to our reality, that is, it’s an illusion, this is the first experiment that can prove it.

bottom line is this, the particle creates a wave pattern interference after passing through the double slits, and hitting the board confusing the scientist they decide to observe the particle as it passes through the slits, this time the particle hits the board and makes a solid particle pattern with no wave interference, the only difference is that they observed, their observing changed existence and this is a repeatable experiment.

THAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE, dont ever forget it, cause they are trying hard to cover it up, play it down, and use disinfo like this to make us forget that they figured this out, more power for them if we dont figure out our control over existence itself.

Bill Gaede doesnt know what he’s talking about, both your sources are way off base, bill doesnt address the most important part and makes no point about whatever he does say, and your source for the double slit experiment also doesnt even mention the most important part of the experiment, this is how dis-info infects the science world.
from http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/21590

“The early generations of quantum physicists, led by Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and John von Neumann, insisted that there is a strong division between the classical world and the quantum realm, although they conceded that the boundary is not fixed by the laws of physics. Their view was that the transformation into “classicality” is effected by the very act of observation; the idea being that the wavefunction “collapses” to a particular value when the observation takes place. To avoid the seemingly decisive role played by the observer, physicists” – (began coming up with any far out idea the could and when that failed they simplied lied to the public closed down particular websites that professed the truth, and put down in technical books that it must be because of an unknown anomaly they even go so far as to say the atmospher interfers, this makes no sense for one because we are only talking about the difference of observation of the particles passing through the slits, or not observing the pass. Condensing before the board or not is only caused by observing its passage through the slits. regardless of that this experiment has been done in a vaccum.)
the significance of this expirement and the motive behind censoring it with these disinfo tactics is that its one the most revolutionary findings ever, it proves beyond a doubt that our actual conciousness is the creater of all that we physical know to exist, this will lead pondering minds to realise we should be able to control the physical by thought, like a god, well this may very well be true if the effect between your concious recognition and the particle could learn to be sensed and controled. the government doesnt want us knowing that.

rick james

this is dis info tactics, this experiment gives light to the hidden nature to our reality, that is, it’s an illusion, this is the first experiment that can prove it.

bottom line is this, the particle creates a wave pattern interference after passing through the double slits, and hitting the board confusing the scientist they decide to observe the particle as it passes through the slits, this time the particle hits the board and makes a solid particle pattern with no wave interference, the only difference is that they observed, their observing changed existence and this is a repeatable experiment.

THAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE, dont ever forget it, cause they are trying hard to cover it up, play it down, and use disinfo like this to make us forget that they figured this out, more power for them if we dont figure out our control over existence itself.

Bill Gaede doesnt know what he’s talking about, both your sources are way off base, bill doesnt address the most important part and makes no point about whatever he does say, and your source for the double slit experiment also doesnt even mention the most important part of the experiment, this is how dis-info infects the science world.
from http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/print/21590

“The early generations of quantum physicists, led by Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg and John von Neumann, insisted that there is a strong division between the classical world and the quantum realm, although they conceded that the boundary is not fixed by the laws of physics. Their view was that the transformation into “classicality” is effected by the very act of observation; the idea being that the wavefunction “collapses” to a particular value when the observation takes place. To avoid the seemingly decisive role played by the observer, physicists” – (began coming up with any far out idea the could and when that failed they simplied lied to the public closed down particular websites that professed the truth, and put down in technical books that it must be because of an unknown anomaly they even go so far as to say the atmospher interfers, this makes no sense for one because we are only talking about the difference of observation of the particles passing through the slits, or not observing the pass. Condensing before the board or not is only caused by observing its passage through the slits. regardless of that this experiment has been done in a vaccum.)
the significance of this expirement and the motive behind censoring it with these disinfo tactics is that its one the most revolutionary findings ever, it proves beyond a doubt that our actual conciousness is the creater of all that we physical know to exist, this will lead pondering minds to realise we should be able to control the physical by thought, like a god, well this may very well be true if the effect between your concious recognition and the particle could learn to be sensed and controled. the government doesnt want us knowing that.

Michael Suede

Buddy, if you can show me a paper explaining why a laser light breaks into an interference pattern when passing over a solid barrier using quantum mechanics, I’ll hear you out.

Until then, keep on rambling.

Oh by the way, the Cornu spiral is a way to mathematically describe the observation of barrier diffraction, it is not an explanation of how light waves are interfering with each other to produce such an effect. This information should save you the trouble of attempting to post such an excuse should you bother to research this further.

You’ll find that there are no explanations in QM for Bill’s needle experiment.

Michael Suede

Buddy, if you can show me a paper explaining why a laser light breaks into an interference pattern when passing over a solid barrier using quantum mechanics, I’ll hear you out.

Until then, keep on rambling.

Oh by the way, the Cornu spiral is a way to mathematically describe the observation of barrier diffraction, it is not an explanation of how light waves are interfering with each other to produce such an effect. This information should save you the trouble of attempting to post such an excuse should you bother to research this further.

You’ll find that there are no explanations in QM for Bill’s needle experiment.

Michael Suede

Buddy, if you can show me a paper explaining why a laser light breaks into an interference pattern when passing over a solid barrier using quantum mechanics, I’ll hear you out.

Until then, keep on rambling.

Oh by the way, the Cornu spiral is a way to mathematically describe the observation of barrier diffraction, it is not an explanation of how light waves are interfering with each other to produce such an effect. This information should save you the trouble of attempting to post such an excuse should you bother to research this further.

You’ll find that there are no explanations in QM for Bill’s needle experiment.

Michael Suede

Buddy, if you can show me a paper explaining why a laser light breaks into an interference pattern when passing over a solid barrier using quantum mechanics, I’ll hear you out.

Until then, keep on rambling.

Oh by the way, the Cornu spiral is a way to mathematically describe the observation of barrier diffraction, it is not an explanation of how light waves are interfering with each other to produce such an effect. This information should save you the trouble of attempting to post such an excuse should you bother to research this further.

You’ll find that there are no explanations in QM for Bill’s needle experiment.

Michael Suede

Buddy, if you can show me a paper explaining why a laser light breaks into an interference pattern when passing over a solid barrier using quantum mechanics, I’ll hear you out.

Until then, keep on rambling.

Oh by the way, the Cornu spiral is a way to mathematically describe the observation of barrier diffraction, it is not an explanation of how light waves are interfering with each other to produce such an effect. This information should save you the trouble of attempting to post such an excuse should you bother to research this further.

You’ll find that there are no explanations in QM for Bill’s needle experiment.

Michael Suede

Buddy, if you can show me a paper explaining why a laser light breaks into an interference pattern when passing over a solid barrier using quantum mechanics, I’ll hear you out.

Until then, keep on rambling.

Oh by the way, the Cornu spiral is a way to mathematically describe the observation of barrier diffraction, it is not an explanation of how light waves are interfering with each other to produce such an effect. This information should save you the trouble of attempting to post such an excuse should you bother to research this further.

You’ll find that there are no explanations in QM for Bill’s needle experiment.

Michael Suede

Buddy, if you can show me a paper explaining why a laser light breaks into an interference pattern when passing over a solid barrier using quantum mechanics, I’ll hear you out.

Until then, keep on rambling.

Oh by the way, the Cornu spiral is a way to mathematically describe the observation of barrier diffraction, it is not an explanation of how light waves are interfering with each other to produce such an effect. This information should save you the trouble of attempting to post such an excuse should you bother to research this further.

You’ll find that there are no explanations in QM for Bill’s needle experiment.

rick james

bs, QM can explain anything because it is circular logic existence, thats whats so perplexing about it and why the scientist have been so excited over this.

rick james

bs, QM can explain anything because it is circular logic existence, thats whats so perplexing about it and why the scientist have been so excited over this.

rick james

bs, QM can explain anything because it is circular logic existence, thats whats so perplexing about it and why the scientist have been so excited over this.

rick james

bs, QM can explain anything because it is circular logic existence, thats whats so perplexing about it and why the scientist have been so excited over this.

rick james

bs, QM can explain anything because it is circular logic existence, thats whats so perplexing about it and why the scientist have been so excited over this.

rick james

bs, QM can explain anything because it is circular logic existence, thats whats so perplexing about it and why the scientist have been so excited over this.

rick james

bs, QM can explain anything because it is circular logic existence, thats whats so perplexing about it and why the scientist have been so excited over this.

Jimmy

Occam’s Razor, anyone? We have two possible explanations for a phenomenon. One is extremely complicated (QM, supported by the majority of scientists) and the other is fairly simple (Bill’s ideas, without a lot of publicity). Couple the human herd instinct with a government school system that teaches you to say “yes,” rather than ask “why,” and it’s no wonder this little philosophical gem is much ignored and maligned.

Jimmy

Occam’s Razor, anyone? We have two possible explanations for a phenomenon. One is extremely complicated (QM, supported by the majority of scientists) and the other is fairly simple (Bill’s ideas, without a lot of publicity). Couple the human herd instinct with a government school system that teaches you to say “yes,” rather than ask “why,” and it’s no wonder this little philosophical gem is much ignored and maligned.

Jimmy

Occam’s Razor, anyone? We have two possible explanations for a phenomenon. One is extremely complicated (QM, supported by the majority of scientists) and the other is fairly simple (Bill’s ideas, without a lot of publicity). Couple the human herd instinct with a government school system that teaches you to say “yes,” rather than ask “why,” and it’s no wonder this little philosophical gem is much ignored and maligned.

Jimmy

Occam’s Razor, anyone? We have two possible explanations for a phenomenon. One is extremely complicated (QM, supported by the majority of scientists) and the other is fairly simple (Bill’s ideas, without a lot of publicity). Couple the human herd instinct with a government school system that teaches you to say “yes,” rather than ask “why,” and it’s no wonder this little philosophical gem is much ignored and maligned.

Jimmy

Occam’s Razor, anyone? We have two possible explanations for a phenomenon. One is extremely complicated (QM, supported by the majority of scientists) and the other is fairly simple (Bill’s ideas, without a lot of publicity). Couple the human herd instinct with a government school system that teaches you to say “yes,” rather than ask “why,” and it’s no wonder this little philosophical gem is much ignored and maligned.

Jimmy

Occam’s Razor, anyone? We have two possible explanations for a phenomenon. One is extremely complicated (QM, supported by the majority of scientists) and the other is fairly simple (Bill’s ideas, without a lot of publicity). Couple the human herd instinct with a government school system that teaches you to say “yes,” rather than ask “why,” and it’s no wonder this little philosophical gem is much ignored and maligned.

Jimmy

Occam’s Razor, anyone? We have two possible explanations for a phenomenon. One is extremely complicated (QM, supported by the majority of scientists) and the other is fairly simple (Bill’s ideas, without a lot of publicity). Couple the human herd instinct with a government school system that teaches you to say “yes,” rather than ask “why,” and it’s no wonder this little philosophical gem is much ignored and maligned.

Dennis

Thank you so much for introducing me to Bill Gaede. My background is not in physics, but for many years I have been highly suspicious of the theory of Relativity, the Big Bang theory, the possibility of time travel, etc. Bill’s videos provide a fascinating trip through the illogical and contradictory nature of Quantum physics. I really like how he analyzes these ideas in a simple and understandable way, unlike the bafflegab which many advocates of Quantum physics spout.

Dennis

Thank you so much for introducing me to Bill Gaede. My background is not in physics, but for many years I have been highly suspicious of the theory of Relativity, the Big Bang theory, the possibility of time travel, etc. Bill’s videos provide a fascinating trip through the illogical and contradictory nature of Quantum physics. I really like how he analyzes these ideas in a simple and understandable way, unlike the bafflegab which many advocates of Quantum physics spout.

Dennis

Thank you so much for introducing me to Bill Gaede. My background is not in physics, but for many years I have been highly suspicious of the theory of Relativity, the Big Bang theory, the possibility of time travel, etc. Bill’s videos provide a fascinating trip through the illogical and contradictory nature of Quantum physics. I really like how he analyzes these ideas in a simple and understandable way, unlike the bafflegab which many advocates of Quantum physics spout.

Dennis

Thank you so much for introducing me to Bill Gaede. My background is not in physics, but for many years I have been highly suspicious of the theory of Relativity, the Big Bang theory, the possibility of time travel, etc. Bill’s videos provide a fascinating trip through the illogical and contradictory nature of Quantum physics. I really like how he analyzes these ideas in a simple and understandable way, unlike the bafflegab which many advocates of Quantum physics spout.

Dennis

Thank you so much for introducing me to Bill Gaede. My background is not in physics, but for many years I have been highly suspicious of the theory of Relativity, the Big Bang theory, the possibility of time travel, etc. Bill’s videos provide a fascinating trip through the illogical and contradictory nature of Quantum physics. I really like how he analyzes these ideas in a simple and understandable way, unlike the bafflegab which many advocates of Quantum physics spout.

Dennis

Thank you so much for introducing me to Bill Gaede. My background is not in physics, but for many years I have been highly suspicious of the theory of Relativity, the Big Bang theory, the possibility of time travel, etc. Bill’s videos provide a fascinating trip through the illogical and contradictory nature of Quantum physics. I really like how he analyzes these ideas in a simple and understandable way, unlike the bafflegab which many advocates of Quantum physics spout.

Dennis

Thank you so much for introducing me to Bill Gaede. My background is not in physics, but for many years I have been highly suspicious of the theory of Relativity, the Big Bang theory, the possibility of time travel, etc. Bill’s videos provide a fascinating trip through the illogical and contradictory nature of Quantum physics. I really like how he analyzes these ideas in a simple and understandable way, unlike the bafflegab which many advocates of Quantum physics spout.

Michael Suede

No problem Dennis -

I want to be clear though, I do not believe Bill’s theory is correct either.

Bill simply demonstrates that the mainstream’s theory is blatantly incorrect.

I believe this is what is really going on:
http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm

Michael Suede

No problem Dennis -

I want to be clear though, I do not believe Bill’s theory is correct either.

Bill simply demonstrates that the mainstream’s theory is blatantly incorrect.

I believe this is what is really going on:
http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm

Michael Suede

No problem Dennis -

I want to be clear though, I do not believe Bill’s theory is correct either.

Bill simply demonstrates that the mainstream’s theory is blatantly incorrect.

I believe this is what is really going on:
http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm

Michael Suede

No problem Dennis -

I want to be clear though, I do not believe Bill’s theory is correct either.

Bill simply demonstrates that the mainstream’s theory is blatantly incorrect.

I believe this is what is really going on:
http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm

Michael Suede

No problem Dennis -

I want to be clear though, I do not believe Bill’s theory is correct either.

Bill simply demonstrates that the mainstream’s theory is blatantly incorrect.

I believe this is what is really going on:
http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm

Michael Suede

No problem Dennis -

I want to be clear though, I do not believe Bill’s theory is correct either.

Bill simply demonstrates that the mainstream’s theory is blatantly incorrect.

I believe this is what is really going on:
http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm

Michael Suede

No problem Dennis -

I want to be clear though, I do not believe Bill’s theory is correct either.

Bill simply demonstrates that the mainstream’s theory is blatantly incorrect.

I believe this is what is really going on:
http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm

Dennis

True enough. I have difficulty with his EM rope theory too. However, at least it doesn’t blatantly violate the laws of logic, unlike Relativity and Quantum physics.

Dennis

True enough. I have difficulty with his EM rope theory too. However, at least it doesn’t blatantly violate the laws of logic, unlike Relativity and Quantum physics.

Dennis

True enough. I have difficulty with his EM rope theory too. However, at least it doesn’t blatantly violate the laws of logic, unlike Relativity and Quantum physics.

Dennis

True enough. I have difficulty with his EM rope theory too. However, at least it doesn’t blatantly violate the laws of logic, unlike Relativity and Quantum physics.

Dennis

True enough. I have difficulty with his EM rope theory too. However, at least it doesn’t blatantly violate the laws of logic, unlike Relativity and Quantum physics.

Dennis

True enough. I have difficulty with his EM rope theory too. However, at least it doesn’t blatantly violate the laws of logic, unlike Relativity and Quantum physics.

Dennis

True enough. I have difficulty with his EM rope theory too. However, at least it doesn’t blatantly violate the laws of logic, unlike Relativity and Quantum physics.

Toralora