<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The State Shoots Man To Death In Sanctioned Violent Homicide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/</link>
	<description>Hate The State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/#comment-4764</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fascistsoup.com/?p=4033#comment-4764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#039;s &quot;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&quot; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#039;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.
My point is that we don&#039;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &quot;Wild West&quot; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#8217;s &#8220;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&#8221; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.<br />
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#8217;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.<br />
My point is that we don&#8217;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &#8220;Wild West&#8221; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fascistsoup.com/?p=4033#comment-4765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#039;s &quot;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&quot; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#039;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.
My point is that we don&#039;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &quot;Wild West&quot; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#8217;s &#8220;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&#8221; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.<br />
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#8217;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.<br />
My point is that we don&#8217;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &#8220;Wild West&#8221; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fascistsoup.com/?p=4033#comment-4766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#039;s &quot;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&quot; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#039;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.
My point is that we don&#039;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &quot;Wild West&quot; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#8217;s &#8220;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&#8221; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.<br />
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#8217;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.<br />
My point is that we don&#8217;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &#8220;Wild West&#8221; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/#comment-4767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fascistsoup.com/?p=4033#comment-4767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#039;s &quot;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&quot; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#039;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.
My point is that we don&#039;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &quot;Wild West&quot; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#8217;s &#8220;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&#8221; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.<br />
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#8217;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.<br />
My point is that we don&#8217;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &#8220;Wild West&#8221; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/#comment-4768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fascistsoup.com/?p=4033#comment-4768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#039;s &quot;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&quot; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#039;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.
My point is that we don&#039;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &quot;Wild West&quot; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#8217;s &#8220;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&#8221; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.<br />
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#8217;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.<br />
My point is that we don&#8217;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &#8220;Wild West&#8221; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fascistsoup.com/?p=4033#comment-4769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#039;s &quot;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&quot; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#039;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.
My point is that we don&#039;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &quot;Wild West&quot; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#8217;s &#8220;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&#8221; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.<br />
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#8217;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.<br />
My point is that we don&#8217;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &#8220;Wild West&#8221; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2010/06/18/the-state-shoots-man-to-death-in-sanctioned-violent-homicide/#comment-4770</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fascistsoup.com/?p=4033#comment-4770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#039;s &quot;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&quot; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#039;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.
My point is that we don&#039;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &quot;Wild West&quot; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever read Robert Heinlein&#8217;s &#8220;The Moon is a Harsh Mistress?&#8221; In his libertarian masterwork, Heinlein depicted what he believed to the an ideal (or close to ideal) libertarian society. At one point during the book, the main character and narrator becomes involved in a lawsuit between two individuals. They are having a dispute over an alleged infraction of one party against another and they go to the narrator with a request for him to serve as their judge, as he was a well-known member of their city and well-respected.<br />
He orders the court on the spot, hears their case, makes his ruling, and relies on the market to enforce it with the threat that the non-compliant party would become an isolated pariah if they didn&#8217;t comply. They paid him (nothing on the Moon is free TANSTAAFL) and that was the end of it.<br />
My point is that we don&#8217;t need the state to take ownership of us and makes us do what they say. The market, and society, is perfectly capable of ordering itself. End of story. If you doubt me, research some real &#8220;Wild West&#8221; history, and not that self-aggrandizing crap Wyatt Earp or Bill Cody sold us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
