This is the problem with socialized economics. They always lead to here. Trying to control society through the economy is the WHOLE problem. Bringing the welfare into the argument was a total ad hom, because bringing in another socialist enterprise to backstop the first economic control is just like treating a symptom of a disease. You are not attacking the underlying problem, the minimum wage. Now, I use to get in all kind of arguments with my Keynesian profs and I so wish I could go rub their nose in the economy. Thanks for the vid.

This is the problem with socialized economics. They always lead to here. Trying to control society through the economy is the WHOLE problem. Bringing the welfare into the argument was a total ad hom, because bringing in another socialist enterprise to backstop the first economic control is just like treating a symptom of a disease. You are not attacking the underlying problem, the minimum wage. Now, I use to get in all kind of arguments with my Keynesian profs and I so wish I could go rub their nose in the economy. Thanks for the vid.

This is the problem with socialized economics. They always lead to here. Trying to control society through the economy is the WHOLE problem. Bringing the welfare into the argument was a total ad hom, because bringing in another socialist enterprise to backstop the first economic control is just like treating a symptom of a disease. You are not attacking the underlying problem, the minimum wage. Now, I use to get in all kind of arguments with my Keynesian profs and I so wish I could go rub their nose in the economy. Thanks for the vid.