Terrorist Hippie Attacks Discovery Channel

September 1, 2010
By

LOL

Apparently an anti-human terrorist hippie has taken a hostage at the Discovery Channel and has issued a manifesto.

Infowars reports:

A eugenicist demanding the Discovery Channel must “broadcast to the world their commitment to save the planet” and “stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants” has taken a hostage at the television network’s headquarters in downtown Silver Spring, Maryland

LOL

According to the Post, a note was posted on the internet on July 18 demanding the implementation of a global eugenics program. “All programs on Discovery Health-TLC must stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants and the false heroics behind those actions,” the post reads. “In those programs’ places, programs encouraging human sterilization and infertility must be pushed. All former pro-birth programs must now push in the direction of stopping human birth, not encouraging it.”

Frankly I’m lollerskating around the office at the moment.

It appears as if the anti-humanist programming lauded by the Discovery Channel and the IPCC has come back to bite themselves in the rear-end.

What I also find oddly amusing is that the eco-Marxist in question has deemed it more important to attack a media outlet than any other possible target.  The hippies instinctively know that mass media programming is more important than laws or actual science.

You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, since the Discovery Channel actively calls humans parasites.

I’m fairly confused by his choice of networks to attack.

From his manifesto:

Focus must be given on how people can live WITHOUT giving birth to more filthy human children since those new additions continue pollution and are pollution.

I agree, we must stop filthy children from polluting the gene pool.

update:

Looks like we have an incident of friendly fire.  ABC is reporting that an environmental militant was shot dead by police.

Since the police are militant statists, it strikes me as odd that they would shoot one of their own.  You’d think the police would be wheeling in free pizza and sleeping bags for this guy.  Perhaps one of those comfy bean bag chairs as well.

Ohhhh… I forgot that police are monopolistic militant statists, thus they are the only ones allowed to be militant statists.  Anyone encroaching on their territory will be shot – as we can see.

  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Current
  • NewsVine
  • Wikio
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Tumblr
  • PDF
  • Print

This entry was posted on September 1, 2010 at 12:32 pm and is filed under Useless Idiots. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

  • Freedom Fighter

    i personally think you’re an idiot. discovery channel pushes forth the same fascist, zionist, racist jewbag agenda that corporations, the us govt, and it’s european jewbag banker leaders love. kiss my ass u trashbucket. until you realize who really controls this country, and what profession specifically, you’ll always be a naive douche that thinks you’re all-knowing, but you only half of the truth. screw jewbags. screw jewbag bankers. and (i’m with you on this) screw fascism.

  • Freedom Fighter

    i personally think you’re an idiot. discovery channel pushes forth the same fascist, zionist, racist jewbag agenda that corporations, the us govt, and it’s european jewbag banker leaders love. kiss my ass u trashbucket. until you realize who really controls this country, and what profession specifically, you’ll always be a naive douche that thinks you’re all-knowing, but you only half of the truth. screw jewbags. screw jewbag bankers. and (i’m with you on this) screw fascism.

  • Freedom Fighter

    i personally think you’re an idiot. discovery channel pushes forth the same fascist, zionist, racist jewbag agenda that corporations, the us govt, and it’s european jewbag banker leaders love. kiss my ass u trashbucket. until you realize who really controls this country, and what profession specifically, you’ll always be a naive douche that thinks you’re all-knowing, but you only half of the truth. screw jewbags. screw jewbag bankers. and (i’m with you on this) screw fascism.

  • Freedom Fighter

    i personally think you’re an idiot. discovery channel pushes forth the same fascist, zionist, racist jewbag agenda that corporations, the us govt, and it’s european jewbag banker leaders love. kiss my ass u trashbucket. until you realize who really controls this country, and what profession specifically, you’ll always be a naive douche that thinks you’re all-knowing, but you only half of the truth. screw jewbags. screw jewbag bankers. and (i’m with you on this) screw fascism.

  • Freedom Fighter

    i personally think you’re an idiot. discovery channel pushes forth the same fascist, zionist, racist jewbag agenda that corporations, the us govt, and it’s european jewbag banker leaders love. kiss my ass u trashbucket. until you realize who really controls this country, and what profession specifically, you’ll always be a naive douche that thinks you’re all-knowing, but you only half of the truth. screw jewbags. screw jewbag bankers. and (i’m with you on this) screw fascism.

  • Freedom Fighter

    i personally think you’re an idiot. discovery channel pushes forth the same fascist, zionist, racist jewbag agenda that corporations, the us govt, and it’s european jewbag banker leaders love. kiss my ass u trashbucket. until you realize who really controls this country, and what profession specifically, you’ll always be a naive douche that thinks you’re all-knowing, but you only half of the truth. screw jewbags. screw jewbag bankers. and (i’m with you on this) screw fascism.

  • Freedom Fighter

    i personally think you’re an idiot. discovery channel pushes forth the same fascist, zionist, racist jewbag agenda that corporations, the us govt, and it’s european jewbag banker leaders love. kiss my ass u trashbucket. until you realize who really controls this country, and what profession specifically, you’ll always be a naive douche that thinks you’re all-knowing, but you only half of the truth. screw jewbags. screw jewbag bankers. and (i’m with you on this) screw fascism.

  • Michael Suede

    I’m not sure what the Jews have to do with dirty hippies and the discovery channel, but you seem confused as to my stance on this subject.

    Actually, you just seem confused.

  • Michael Suede

    I’m not sure what the Jews have to do with dirty hippies and the discovery channel, but you seem confused as to my stance on this subject.

    Actually, you just seem confused.

  • Michael Suede

    I’m not sure what the Jews have to do with dirty hippies and the discovery channel, but you seem confused as to my stance on this subject.

    Actually, you just seem confused.

  • Michael Suede

    I’m not sure what the Jews have to do with dirty hippies and the discovery channel, but you seem confused as to my stance on this subject.

    Actually, you just seem confused.

  • Michael Suede

    I’m not sure what the Jews have to do with dirty hippies and the discovery channel, but you seem confused as to my stance on this subject.

    Actually, you just seem confused.

  • Michael Suede

    I’m not sure what the Jews have to do with dirty hippies and the discovery channel, but you seem confused as to my stance on this subject.

    Actually, you just seem confused.

  • Michael Suede

    I’m not sure what the Jews have to do with dirty hippies and the discovery channel, but you seem confused as to my stance on this subject.

    Actually, you just seem confused.

  • Davidd

    discovery channel supports coorperatism, according to roosevelt the definition of fascism.

    There is a huge gap between eugenics believing in the reduction of the planet population (which is retarded and dangerous)
    and the hippie ideals of universal love and sex without condoms.

    On top of all this mislabeling you did, you actually seem to agree with the idiot eugenics tard.

  • Davidd

    discovery channel supports coorperatism, according to roosevelt the definition of fascism.

    There is a huge gap between eugenics believing in the reduction of the planet population (which is retarded and dangerous)
    and the hippie ideals of universal love and sex without condoms.

    On top of all this mislabeling you did, you actually seem to agree with the idiot eugenics tard.

  • Davidd

    discovery channel supports coorperatism, according to roosevelt the definition of fascism.

    There is a huge gap between eugenics believing in the reduction of the planet population (which is retarded and dangerous)
    and the hippie ideals of universal love and sex without condoms.

    On top of all this mislabeling you did, you actually seem to agree with the idiot eugenics tard.

  • Davidd

    discovery channel supports coorperatism, according to roosevelt the definition of fascism.

    There is a huge gap between eugenics believing in the reduction of the planet population (which is retarded and dangerous)
    and the hippie ideals of universal love and sex without condoms.

    On top of all this mislabeling you did, you actually seem to agree with the idiot eugenics tard.

  • Davidd

    discovery channel supports coorperatism, according to roosevelt the definition of fascism.

    There is a huge gap between eugenics believing in the reduction of the planet population (which is retarded and dangerous)
    and the hippie ideals of universal love and sex without condoms.

    On top of all this mislabeling you did, you actually seem to agree with the idiot eugenics tard.

  • Davidd

    discovery channel supports coorperatism, according to roosevelt the definition of fascism.

    There is a huge gap between eugenics believing in the reduction of the planet population (which is retarded and dangerous)
    and the hippie ideals of universal love and sex without condoms.

    On top of all this mislabeling you did, you actually seem to agree with the idiot eugenics tard.

  • Davidd

    discovery channel supports coorperatism, according to roosevelt the definition of fascism.

    There is a huge gap between eugenics believing in the reduction of the planet population (which is retarded and dangerous)
    and the hippie ideals of universal love and sex without condoms.

    On top of all this mislabeling you did, you actually seem to agree with the idiot eugenics tard.

  • Michael Suede

    You must be reading a different article than the one I wrote. Either that or the sarcasm is flying right over your head.

    I like to think my readers are smarter than the average bear, but I guess not.

  • Michael Suede

    You must be reading a different article than the one I wrote. Either that or the sarcasm is flying right over your head.

    I like to think my readers are smarter than the average bear, but I guess not.

  • Michael Suede

    You must be reading a different article than the one I wrote. Either that or the sarcasm is flying right over your head.

    I like to think my readers are smarter than the average bear, but I guess not.

  • Michael Suede

    You must be reading a different article than the one I wrote. Either that or the sarcasm is flying right over your head.

    I like to think my readers are smarter than the average bear, but I guess not.

  • Michael Suede

    You must be reading a different article than the one I wrote. Either that or the sarcasm is flying right over your head.

    I like to think my readers are smarter than the average bear, but I guess not.

  • Michael Suede

    You must be reading a different article than the one I wrote. Either that or the sarcasm is flying right over your head.

    I like to think my readers are smarter than the average bear, but I guess not.

  • Michael Suede

    You must be reading a different article than the one I wrote. Either that or the sarcasm is flying right over your head.

    I like to think my readers are smarter than the average bear, but I guess not.

  • Davidd

    You have to learn english before you attack me dude. My english might not be the best at times, but i do allright for a non-native speaker.

    You know what the word “Seem” means?

    You write:
    “You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

    This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

    You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

    I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

    If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

  • Davidd

    You have to learn english before you attack me dude. My english might not be the best at times, but i do allright for a non-native speaker.

    You know what the word “Seem” means?

    You write:
    “You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

    This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

    You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

    I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

    If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

  • Davidd

    You have to learn english before you attack me dude. My english might not be the best at times, but i do allright for a non-native speaker.

    You know what the word “Seem” means?

    You write:
    “You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

    This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

    You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

    I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

    If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

  • Davidd

    You have to learn english before you attack me dude. My english might not be the best at times, but i do allright for a non-native speaker.

    You know what the word “Seem” means?

    You write:
    “You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

    This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

    You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

    I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

    If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

  • Davidd

    You have to learn english before you attack me dude. My english might not be the best at times, but i do allright for a non-native speaker.

    You know what the word “Seem” means?

    You write:
    “You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

    This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

    You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

    I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

    If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

  • Davidd

    You have to learn english before you attack me dude. My english might not be the best at times, but i do allright for a non-native speaker.

    You know what the word “Seem” means?

    You write:
    “You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

    This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

    You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

    I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

    If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

  • Davidd

    You have to learn english before you attack me dude. My english might not be the best at times, but i do allright for a non-native speaker.

    You know what the word “Seem” means?

    You write:
    “You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

    This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

    You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

    I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

    If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

  • Michael Suede

    If you had simply said “the word which is ambiguous”, I wouldn’t have attacked you!

    I’m not exactly a mind reader.

    If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

  • Michael Suede

    If you had simply said “the word which is ambiguous”, I wouldn’t have attacked you!

    I’m not exactly a mind reader.

    If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

  • Michael Suede

    If you had simply said “the word which is ambiguous”, I wouldn’t have attacked you!

    I’m not exactly a mind reader.

    If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

  • Michael Suede

    If you had simply said “the word which is ambiguous”, I wouldn’t have attacked you!

    I’m not exactly a mind reader.

    If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

  • Michael Suede

    If you had simply said “the word which is ambiguous”, I wouldn’t have attacked you!

    I’m not exactly a mind reader.

    If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

  • Michael Suede

    If you had simply said “the word which is ambiguous”, I wouldn’t have attacked you!

    I’m not exactly a mind reader.

    If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

  • Michael Suede

    If you had simply said “the word which is ambiguous”, I wouldn’t have attacked you!

    I’m not exactly a mind reader.

    If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.