I’m not exactly a mind reader.

If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

I’m not exactly a mind reader.

If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

I’m not exactly a mind reader.

If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

I’m not exactly a mind reader.

If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

I’m not exactly a mind reader.

If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

I’m not exactly a mind reader.

If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

I’m not exactly a mind reader.

If you want to point out a grammatical flaw, then you need to actually state clearly what that flaw is. Otherwise I will have no idea WTF you are talking about and will assume you are a communist that needs bashing.

You know what the word “Seem” means?

You write:
“You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

You know what the word “Seem” means?

You write:
“You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!

You know what the word “Seem” means?

You write:
“You’d think he would attack some media outlet that actually posts anti-global warming propaganda rather than the Discovery Channel, which actively calls humans parasites like himself.”

This sentence is ambiguous. The word “which” can refer both to “The Discovery Channel” or to “some media outlet”; On top of that, you probably meant to write “like he does too” instead of “himself”. I dont think him being called a parasite by them is the motivation you meant.

You cannot make a claim to “sarcasm” when your ramblings are so ambiguous, and your english skills are so weak that half the time it isnt really clear what you mean in the first place.

I understood you didnt agree with the guy because you called him a hippie. But really, the fact that you think attacking me here would contribute anything annoys me. I am making the effort to unravel your thoughts and try to contribute tips to improve your writings. If you can not handle people disagreeing, well, maybe you are a fascist yourself without realising it.

If reading this hurts, think twice about attacking your readers next time!