Isn’t it amazing how I keep being proven right about everything?
The Daily Mail drops a bomb:
New American research shows that there could be a link between the controversial MMR triple vaccine and autism and bowel disease in children.
The study appears to confirm the findings of British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who caused a storm in 1998 by suggesting a possible link.
Now a team from the Wake Forest University School of Medicine in North Carolina are examining 275 children with regressive autism and bowel disease – and of the 82 tested so far, 70 prove positive for the measles virus.
Last night the team’s leader, Dr Stephen Walker, said: ‘Of the handful of results we have in so far, all are vaccine strain and none are wild measles.
‘This research proves that in the gastrointestinal tract of a number of children who have been diagnosed with regressive autism, there is evidence of measles virus.
‘What it means is that the study done earlier by Dr Wakefield and published in 1998 is correct. That study didn’t draw any conclusions about specifically what it means to find measles virus in the gut, but the implication is it may be coming from the MMR vaccine. If that’s the case, and this live virus is residing in the gastrointestinal tract of some children, and then they have GI inflammation and other problems, it may be related to the MMR.’
The 1998 study by Dr Wakefield, then a reader in gastroenterology at the Royal Free Hospital in North London, and 12 other doctors claimed to have found a new bowel disease, autism enterocolitis.
Am I prophet sent by god?
I simply think logically and don’t believe anything that comes out of the government’s mouth.
Did you know vaccine lawsuits are resolved in a special court called “vaccine court”?
This is insanity!
Sanjay Gupta explains:
Vaccine court is the popular term which refers to the Office of Special Masters of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, which administers a no-fault system for litigating vaccine injury claims. These claims against vaccine manufacturers cannot normally be filed in state or federal civil courts, but instead must be heard in the Court of Claims, sitting without a jury. The program was established by the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), passed by the United States Congress in response to a threat to the vaccine supply due to a 1980s scare over the DPT vaccine. Despite the belief of most public health officials that claims of side effects were unfounded, large jury awards had been given to some plaintiffs, most DPT vaccine makers had ceased production, and officials feared the loss of herd immunity.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
In modern terms, that is to say, any civil court case valued over 20 dollars has to be tried by a jury if one of the parties demands it.
Do you understand why this court was created?
Lets pull out the words:
officials feared the loss
That is to say, bureaucrats feared that big pharma might get bankrupted under a tidal wave of lawsuits, which of course, would greatly affect their campaign coffers since big pharama pays off the politicians.
Can’t have that now.
So if a vaccine farks up your kid, you can’t drag the pharma company that made it before a civil court jury.
Its not allowed.
The judges are funded from this vaccine tax as well. Thus, if vaccine makers were put out of business from lawsuits, the judge would be out of a job as well.