Comments on: Cosmologists Achieve a New Level of Bullshit – Planets Made of Solid Diamond

By: Max

Max — Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:19:00 +0000

first off, im in middle school, and I know your the one full of bull sh*t, I don’t give a crap that your “profesional physicyts” say something that may disagree with this. I don’t see ANY evidence what so ever that supports you and your just saying that if you belive this, your nuts, as you said in an earlier response to a comment. No this theory does not include electromagnetics because they dont make a difference, electromagnetics are caused by electrons flowing about, making a magnetic field, or the other way around. That force is not powerfull enough at that scale of 1,000s of miles in diameter, at least! You obviously have no clue what you are talking about because when you mentioned the fact about gravity how mass bends space, you said whatever that means. Even I know what that means! The mass has gravity which pushes spacetime into a bowl shape around it which other bodies, like the moon for earth, roll in a circle, they don’t stop because since space is effectivley empty besides any bodies floating through it, there is no friction, thats why the pennies in that funnel at the mall, you know the one, actually fall in, friction! Oh yeah, and the gravity and orbits of other nearby bodies have nothing to do with electromagnetics. Nothing says that a planet that is solid, or largely composed of diamond is impossible, carbon under extreme heat and pressure becomes diamond, that’s how they’re made on earth. And that carbon was no doubt exposed to those conditions as IT USED TO BE THE CENTER OF A COLLAPING STAR! And ANYTHING on that bull sh*t list you made I could rip to pieces and throw at your face. I apologize for any spelling mistakes in this comment.

By: Ness_teea

Ness_teea — Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:24:00 +0000

@michaelsuede this is so convincing…NOT

By: David Santos

David Santos — Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:45:00 +0000

The question that kept hovering my head while I read was this: why can’t a planet be made of diamond?

You keep saying how asinine would be to believe that claim, but why is it so obviously false? Can’t a planet be made of diamond? Is it physically/chemically impossible?

By: Michael Suede

Michael Suede — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:50:00 +0000

Clearly you did not watch the lectures by professional physicists I posted in the thread. - And you are the one calling me ignorant?

By: Briandoodo

Briandoodo — Thu, 17 Nov 2011 17:41:00 +0000

Time travel is real, many of these claims are not backed up and are simply not true.

By: Idiot

Idiot — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:22:00 +0000

I think it’s amazing that the author can talk about astrophysics and cosmology as though he is an authority, even though he clearly has no education in the subject whatsoever. And he can make numerous claims based on no evidence and still have people praise him for his extreme ignorance. Bravo.

By: Luc

Luc — Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:02:00 +0000

I eagerly await the ivory towers to crumble under their own hubris, academia has wasted so much wealth and minds on diddling away in their monasteries.
It might be a lot sooner then anyone thinks once the collage bubble pops and diddlers have to do something of value for once.

By: orkneylad

orkneylad — Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:56:00 +0000

Electric Universe Theory down the Wikipedian Memory Hole:
http://www.glebedigital.co.uk/blog/?p=2360

“Wikipedia tore down nearly all their entry on tides a year or so back, and replaced it with some very basic stuff.”
[tallbloke blogged email to Leif Svalgaard: May 26, 2011 at 6:39 pm]

Incidents like the above are becoming very common, it seems.

During the early Climategate days it became clear that forces within
wikipedia were suppressing pages relating to the issue. In a recent
post of mine on wiki,
we saw how wikipedia have written the Electric Universe Theory out of
their site. So much for any pretence at being an unbiased repository
for knowledge.

On the positive side, when you see a theory being suppressed in this way you KNOW you’re onto something good, and something so alarming that the ruling paradigm doesn’t want you to know it even exists.

Hidden in plain sight:
http://www.glebedigital.co.uk/blog/?p=2983

As the BBC prepares to officially ignore scientific views OUTSIDE the man-made warming paradigm, we also see CERN physists being told NOT to interpret the significance of its research into cosmic rays & cloud formation.

Interesting also when Adrian Scaife [of the UK Met Office] recently stated in June:
“We now believe that [the solar cycle] accounts for 50 per cent of the variability from year to year”

The Svensmark Hypothesis is fast becoming the predominant paradigm and you can’t keep it quiet forever.

Also interesting this week to see connections between the University
of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit [CRU] and the now arrested phone
hacker Neil Wallis.

It appears the lunatics are in-charge of the asylum.

By: Michael Suede

Michael Suede — Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:44:00 +0000

I’m mad.

I’m here to vent.

By: Hoz Turner

Hoz Turner — Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:30:00 +0000

While I agree with your premises, I suggest that
you perhaps tone down the language as I think it will harm your
credibility – particularly amongst those who are seeking new knowledge,
sitting on the fence, etc.