It is logically impossible to create an orange ball out of red blocks. It cannot be done. The properties of the ball must be part of its constituent parts make up.

Any properties of a system must be derived from its constituent parts. Arguing against this is illogical. Strong emergence is a form of magic.

I couldn’t make it past the beginning when you were making ridiculous logical errors.  ”If you think X is like this, then it MUST be true that Y is like this because (blah blah blah).”  By completely failing to consider other possibilities, you lose credibility right there.  Maybe you accidentally were using unforgiving language and were merely offering this up as a “high on marijuana and had this idea” type of thing.

If not, you should really take a step back and try to recognize that you don’t know too much about the science of what you are talking about.  Just because you don’t seem to think that consciousness can come from matter, why is that necessarily true?  Do you know what consciousness is?  What it consists of and does not consist of?  Do you understand how the neural network of the brain – containing a mind-blowing (pun, yes, intended) 1 trillion (that’s 1,000,000,000,000) neurons – works?  We don’t even have computers with that many bits yet, but we already have many instances of computers that can arguably pass the Turing test for intelligence.  

Many scientists and philosophers hypothesize that consciousness is an emergent property.  Not a property of matter, but of the network that that matter creates.  Until you disprove this, the rest of your post is simply pretentious rambling.

Grade school physics is Newtonian and deterministic. High school and college physics adds quantum physics which includes non-determinism.

Clearly they are not conscious.

And if you want to claim some obscure explanation like multiple dimensions, explain how this is better and different than claiming consciousness is simply a fundamental component of the universe.

And how do you know that all interactions of matter are deterministic? Maybe there is a spectrum of consciousness.

You also still haven’t defined strong emergence.

The problem with all of this is that you still haven’t defined what the word “consciousness” means.

Given that strong emergence is impossible, and given that we know fundamental components of matter are not conscious, Occam’s razor favors consciousness as a fundamental component of the universe.

If the interactions of matter were the basis for consciousness, then clearly their could be no free will, since all actions of matter are deterministic.  I for one believe I am my own person, my will is my own, it is not based on the deterministic actions of matter that I have no control over.