The controllers of the state, large multinationals, and the state has simply become to big and powerful. What is more important, is that these groupings are also much better organised than any other grouping. How will the Anarchists get the majority of US Citizens to support them? They will have to be more organised than their opponents and also appeal to more people than their opponents. I simply do not think that a society of liberterian anarchist will be able to be influential enough to fundementally change the worst empire in history, an empire that has caused more damage than any before them. And the American Empire itself is in turn controlled by a global financial elite that do not show their faces to the public.

Even in tribal societies there is some kind of democracy. The elders get together and debate things and then decide what best should be done to keep peace in their community. The more complex a society gets, the more complex the governing structure becomes. If people looked out for each other, states would not even come into being.

What is wrong in the so called American Democracy is that big money controls it as you rightly point out. So that is one of the key problems that needs to be addressed. The other is the democratic system itself. And the big one is that monopolies capitalism is allowed to reign freely. No monopoly should be allowed. The first monopoly to break should be that of media monopoly. The USA elections are controlled in mainly two ways. Firstly private funding of political parties and election campaigns and secondly control of the media through media monopolies. The same corporations and people controlling them then lobby politicians to implement policies that favour them. And that includes the creation of regulatory agencies that serves as places of control for corporates when they make sure that strategic positions in these regulatory institutions and high government positions are occupied by their people through a revolving door policy.

So if all the issues listed above could be eliminated, democracy in the USA would not be such a bad thing. It can be done. Start a party that will get the support of a broad group of people. Stay away from ideological labels, debates and attacking particular institutions or people. Simply state the obvious, America is bankrupt, very corrupt and spending far too much on the war machine. Then start a political party that can hopefully still take part in the next elections. The party manifesto is simply the following: 1. USA need a Federal Electoral Commission with limited powers which they share with political parties. All campaign donations should go to a central fund. Political parties are then allocated a percentage of funds based on the amount of proven party members of eligible voters. Parties only allowed to charge a maximum amount of say USD 100 for party membership. 2. A company cannot own more than one national television station and one national newspaper. No cross ownership allowed. A company owning a national television station and newspaper cannot own any state based television stations or newspapers. International news agencies not allowed to own any newspapers or television stations. 3. Lobbying to be outlawed and to be replaced by public participation of voluntary interest groups in legislation. 4. Tax exemptions of foundations such as Carnegie, Rockefeller, CFR and religious groupings to be ended. They are simply political lobbying groups towing the line of corporate masters and other manipulators. If taxed, they need to be run like any business. 5. Bring an end to “revolving doors” by making it illegal for senior government officials to work in a position of influence in the private sector in the same industry or field they worked in government. The private sector does this all the time by demanding senior officials to sign restriction of trade agreements. Although this is a curtailment of individual liberty this is in the interest of the public as this will stop large corporates from controlling industries by manipulating government institutions. 6. I would also like to include the ending of the federal reserve system but maybe it would be best to demand the audit of the federal reserve system as well as an investigation of all the problems that was created over  particularly the last 50 years, but also since the inception of the federal reserve system,  and the reform of the financial system based on a process of investigation and proposing alternatives by experts not connected to the current system which will then be debated in public before new reforms are legislated.

This is a minimum that is needed to ensure that politics in the USA is freed from the control of big corporates. The owners of big monopolies and those that support them are in a minority. The aim of this party is to first end the stranglehold of the big corporates and the two parties they own, the “Democratic” and “Republican” parties over the political system in the USA. The only statement on policy should be that all government institutions and policies are to be reviewed by elected officials, the relevant stakeholders (e.g. government departments / institutions, industry associations, labour associations, public interest groups and the general public). This is about saving the USA and world economy as well as bringing true democracy to the USA for the first time in it’s history.

An interesting reform of the electoral and governing system of the USA and which should be one of the proposed reforms and not one that is forced onto the electorate, could be along the line of Ghaddafi’s green book. In a city the smallest governing unit is for a group of e.g. 240 eligible voters, who live as neighbours next to each other, to form a governing body responsible for all issues effecting that group which they can handle e.g. education of children, fund-raising for community initiatives, crime prevention, waste removal, road maintenance, whatever. They then select representatives 4 representatives 2 elders, male and female, and two youths (male and female between e.g. 30 and 20) who will represent them in a group of again 240 people at the next layer that will handle inter-group issues. This can continue up to state and then national level. The top group will always need the approval of the bottom group for any decision they make. A cumbersome system, but one that could ensure maximum liberty. Of course, how decision making is done within groups is another matter. Should one use consensus or a voting with a simple or 2 third majority? If people want to group themselves in political parties at any level, that’s up to them.

My main argument is that the monopoly of big capital and their cohorts, the Democratic and Republican parties should be broken. This is more important than debates over ideologies. If you stay away from ideologies, which includes whatever flavour of anarchism you favour, you have the best chance of creating a united front to break the political monopoly which will allow you to break the capital monopolies which will enable true free enterprise and more important, freedom of being. By staying away from ideology one can focus on the core issues which inhibits the freedom of the American people. And the medium you can use to run the campaign is the internet and word of mouth. With emails, youtube, social media etc you can get the messsage to most people without needing huge sums of money, rather the energy and resources of volunteers. Then you will also need dedicated volunteers who can take the message to people who don’t use the Internet e.g. old age homes, homeless people etc. Of course, you will need a presidential candidate as well as candidates for other levels of government. Choose untainted non-party affiliated people with good leadership qualities who are not professional politicians but natural leaders.

And if you want to start experiments with anarchy, you can do it now. Start first one, then a group of intentional communities / ecovillages based on the principles of your flavour of anarchism and make it work. Then you will have the practical experience and working examples of your ideas which you can use to convince people of your ideas. All these ideological debates are simply word wars which don’t influence much and are easy to do because you do not have to accomplish anything measurable in the real world. This is as true for me as it is for you.

I am from South Africa but as whatever happens in the biggest economy and most powerful political entity in the world, has an influence on us here, it is in my interest that the system in the USA is reformed. The current OWC will by itself, not change anything as it will simply be smashed or co-opted, especially if they cannot offer alternatives. U have an electoral system. Use it creatively and with maximum effect to free yourself from your current slavery.

May Mr. Paul win through.  

Yes, I recognize the Libertarians reject Dr. Paul for his stance on abortion.  So it is your right.  I would implore you – and this will look quite odd as compared to my previous letters in this digital document – but I will implore you to take a look at your own aura if you can.  It’s not hard and it doesn’t take much discipline, I’m self taught (with no chemical helpers) I learned how with the help of a Buddhist.  Maybe you’re deriding that I learned from a Buddhist?  If not, kudos.  She also had a Ph.D in Philosophy and a masters in business so she wasn’t your typical run of the mill Tibetan monk type if you know what I mean.  Why do I say look at your aura?  See it?  See yourself, in that mirror, while you sit with an amazing halo of light around yourself that can only grow as your interest to investigate new found being grows.  It is existential proof life is connected beyond the flesh, that it reaches out far into reality beyond the scopes we currently understand.  If you can tell me after that… that you can end, or defend the ending of any life frivolously, I will be astounded.  While I do agree with allowing abortion in the case of rape, incest or imminent death (as in hours away) of the mother (though really, the mother that would elect her own life over her child’s, I do not understand entirely) – my Dad had a wonderful story for me (though it didn’t change my stance on the rape, incest or imminent death cases…forgive the parentheses, better editing and writing would cure that, but it’s late!):

A medical school professor has his 20 some odd students in class.  They’re second year students and the professor throws down the gauntlet in class one day.

“Students, you are doctors.  You have a patient come to your office; she is young, malnourished, sick with a very bad cough.  She is pregnant.  She is a single mother.  She has no income and no family to help her and from all the testing you can run on her, her baby may likely be the death of her and if she lives.  She has little hope of caring for a child in week condition, much less providing for the child.”  the professor pauses “What is your diagnosis and advice for this young mother?”

Every student in the class recommends an abortion

The Professor, looking smugly at his students says

“Congratulations, you just killed Beethoven.”

Vote Paul dear folk.  I know you would see me as I look at those who would implore me to vote for Romney or Perry should they win the primary:  Nuts.  But if all that stands in the way is that stance on abortion, and I can see no other impedance, then vote for Paul.  Yes, he’s a strict Constitutionalist and not a strict Destructionalist-Anarchist.  But, he’s still fiscally conservative, which happens to be quite similar, if not exactly the same as a fiscally libertarian given where we are in monopoly- money-world.  This country is dying by the printing of money, not acts of abortion or the abolishing thereof.  You all still have some time to switch parties and get in before the primaries to show all the media outlets, all those with the power, that it matters not what they black out:  The Revolution Will Not Be Televised.