<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oregon Proposes Law To Make Cigarettes A Schedule III Controlled Substance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertariannews.org/2013/01/24/oregon-proposes-law-to-make-cigarettes-a-schedule-iii-controlled-substance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2013/01/24/oregon-proposes-law-to-make-cigarettes-a-schedule-iii-controlled-substance/</link>
	<description>Hate The State</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2013/01/24/oregon-proposes-law-to-make-cigarettes-a-schedule-iii-controlled-substance/#comment-11771</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariannews.org/?p=15747#comment-11771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that you can forcibly stop anyone from smoking. It is a kind of habit that is not easy to give up. It needs strong will power and family support. In fact, there are electronic cigarettes available in the market and it is suggested that they can help people quit smoking. It is different from traditional cigarettes in the sense that they produce vapors instead of deadly tobacco smoke plus it contains nicotine in liquid form which is less harmful than tobacco.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.best4ecigs.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Best4Ecig&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that you can forcibly stop anyone from smoking. It is a kind of habit that is not easy to give up. It needs strong will power and family support. In fact, there are electronic cigarettes available in the market and it is suggested that they can help people quit smoking. It is different from traditional cigarettes in the sense that they produce vapors instead of deadly tobacco smoke plus it contains nicotine in liquid form which is less harmful than tobacco.<br />
<a href="http://www.best4ecigs.com/" rel="nofollow">Best4Ecig</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry White Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2013/01/24/oregon-proposes-law-to-make-cigarettes-a-schedule-iii-controlled-substance/#comment-11651</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry White Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariannews.org/?p=15747#comment-11651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State has the &quot;right&quot; because it has the exclusive monopoly on the use of violence. Just as a bully believes they have the &quot;right&quot; to your lunch money, so to does the State. Of course, the State also believes it has the &quot;right&quot; to you&#039;re life and your liberty too.

A majority of human beings don&#039;t care what the State does because most of them in some form or another derive benefits from the State. It&#039;s hard to get support from Mary and Peter when Paul comes to rob you and gives a portion of that stolen money to Mary and Peter.

The State is a flawed concept that derives it&#039;s existence due entirely to human nature. As a single man if he would steal from another, he would tell you no. Ask him if he would accept money stolen from his neighbor, again he may tell you no. However, ask if he would accept a tax credit, and he would most likely accept it. He fails to see that the tax credit comes from stealing money from his neighbor and gives it to him, so he doesn&#039;t think it is stealing. In fact, he would justify his acceptance, so religiously, he believes in the State as an entity that does more good then harm.

The State can indeed elevate a doctor above a man. The State is a creation of fiction, and like any good book, they can make anything they want happen. A &quot;doctor&quot; can be elevated to a &quot;God&quot; with just a few words written on paper. A &quot;doctor&quot; can turn a simple act of self-medication, into a criminal act by simply refusing to act. The State believes it owns you, and as such it can do with you, like any regular master to their slave, that it wants to.

Of course, when the State is put into reality, and other human beings are shown the &#039;emperor&#039; has no clothes, then you are correct, it is indeed absolutely ridiculous. Unfortunately, most human beings believe the State does exists, that it can in fact act as a human being acts, and anything the State says is righteous and true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State has the &#8220;right&#8221; because it has the exclusive monopoly on the use of violence. Just as a bully believes they have the &#8220;right&#8221; to your lunch money, so to does the State. Of course, the State also believes it has the &#8220;right&#8221; to you&#8217;re life and your liberty too.</p>
<p>A majority of human beings don&#8217;t care what the State does because most of them in some form or another derive benefits from the State. It&#8217;s hard to get support from Mary and Peter when Paul comes to rob you and gives a portion of that stolen money to Mary and Peter.</p>
<p>The State is a flawed concept that derives it&#8217;s existence due entirely to human nature. As a single man if he would steal from another, he would tell you no. Ask him if he would accept money stolen from his neighbor, again he may tell you no. However, ask if he would accept a tax credit, and he would most likely accept it. He fails to see that the tax credit comes from stealing money from his neighbor and gives it to him, so he doesn&#8217;t think it is stealing. In fact, he would justify his acceptance, so religiously, he believes in the State as an entity that does more good then harm.</p>
<p>The State can indeed elevate a doctor above a man. The State is a creation of fiction, and like any good book, they can make anything they want happen. A &#8220;doctor&#8221; can be elevated to a &#8220;God&#8221; with just a few words written on paper. A &#8220;doctor&#8221; can turn a simple act of self-medication, into a criminal act by simply refusing to act. The State believes it owns you, and as such it can do with you, like any regular master to their slave, that it wants to.</p>
<p>Of course, when the State is put into reality, and other human beings are shown the &#8216;emperor&#8217; has no clothes, then you are correct, it is indeed absolutely ridiculous. Unfortunately, most human beings believe the State does exists, that it can in fact act as a human being acts, and anything the State says is righteous and true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.libertariannews.org/2013/01/24/oregon-proposes-law-to-make-cigarettes-a-schedule-iii-controlled-substance/#comment-11635</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertariannews.org/?p=15747#comment-11635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I smoked for twelve years until I found out the way to quit. Stop buying tobacco. Works 100% of the time. i don&#039;t see where the government gets the right to make anything illegal. They can&#039;t elevate a doctor above a man. The entire concept is ridiculous.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smoked for twelve years until I found out the way to quit. Stop buying tobacco. Works 100% of the time. i don&#8217;t see where the government gets the right to make anything illegal. They can&#8217;t elevate a doctor above a man. The entire concept is ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
